GOSH. Did you know EBAY sells a pair of sneakers every 5 seconds?
Then why does EBAY need sellers who literally post a thousand dirty, humiliating photos of "ex-wives" and "ex-girlfriends" and celebrities?
Isn't EBAY making enough money without being pimps for woman-hating monsters? A guy in his 60's in New Jersey is making money downloading Photoshop woman-hate from sneaky Internet porn forums and printing it out. Images like THIS:
A woman is put in bondage and kept there till, in humiliation, she starts urinating. That's not the bad part, oddly enough.
The woman is a paid porn actress who has consented to be in a bondage-fetish photo shoot. The woman from the NECK DOWN.
Someone else's head has been Photoshopped into the picture. The full EBAY AD:
Jennette McCurdy has NO IDEA a woman-hater is using her this way: to get $11 from another woman-hater.
JOHNSWELLSTUFF12 has over 1,000 such images, on everyone from Taylor Swift to wholesome deceased stars Annette Funicello, Donna Douglas and Donna Reed. (The more wholesome the star and the more debased the faked image, the more likely the sale).
Here's a fact about SNEAKY EBAY: if Jennette McCurdy or Taylor Swift typed their names in on EBAY.COM they would not see the porn ads on them. They wouldn't even see the ad censored with a disclaimer: "ADULTS ONLY item needs legal age verification and consent."
NO. EBAY doesn't want their dirty secret to be so obvious. Items such as the above are hidden where only the thousands of creepy, dangerous woman-haters know to look. They know to go to EBAY.COM, scroll the category list to "everything else...ADULT..." and bookmark that.
Many celebrities, agents and managers who have seen this website and joined the VeRO program (to take down such items) had NO IDEA there was an adult section filled with such hateful images. That's how SNEAKY the supposedly moral and profitable EBAY really is.
Why allow JOHNSWELLSTUFF12 and others (noted in posts below) sell junk like this? There's no CONSENT. Federal law is being broken. The sellers do not state they have a signed model release.
EBAY is so desperate to be pimp to amateur woman-haters, and take a dollar of the profit? To award a seller like this a "TOP RATED" insignia?
Right now EBAY shrugs and says that Jennette McCurdy and Taylor Swift and Emma Watson and 100 other actresses, as well as every "ex-wife" and "ex-girlfriend," should know about their dirty secret "Adults Only" area, check it every week, and e-mail a takedown REQUEST to them.
EBAY seems to be siding with the date rapists of the world, the ones who figure if a woman has passed out, she can be assaulted without consent. From the college kid who raped a girl at a party to the Uber driver who raped a woman who had passed out in a car, the message is: it's the woman's fault. Even if she is unaware of what's going on. Where do these guys get such ideas? Maybe from trolling EBAY and the porn section loaded with woman-hating photos of humiliation and degradation.
EBAY, which actually has rules on "offensive materials," somehow doesn't find it offensive to graft a woman's head on a porn image, or to have headers that read "my ex-wife naked" or "hot pix of my ex-girlfriend," sold with the extra hate-thrill that the woman are being victimized by REVENGE PORN without their CONSENT.
ONE DAY.
ONE DAY this SITE will be able to say: CEO DEVIN WENIG and LEGAL COUNSEL MARIE OH HUBER have rectified an oversight, and EBAY NO LONGER PROFITS FROM WOMAN-HATING PORNOGRAPHY DONE WITHOUT A WOMAN'S KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT.
When will that day come?
Please contact your local politician, your state Senator, the Attorney General, or the FTC, and voice your concern about EBAY breaking Federal law on signed model releases, and abusing women for fun and profit.
I work for a nonprofit that fights against pornography, and we were directed to your website for evidence of foul play by ebay. It definitely looks like you care about the sexual exploitation of women, and are trying to fight these issues, and for that I commend you. However, I am concerned that your blog is doing more harm than good. By reposting these ads, without blurring the images, you are also continuing the exploitation of women and exposing everyone who accesses your sight to pornography. I would beg you to please go through all of your photos and blur them, so that people do not have to see these horrific pictures. Descriptions with blurs will be just as effective, without creating arousal in viewers, but still inform them of the problem.
ReplyDelete