JENNIFER LAWRENCE - What IS the STORY?

JENNIFER LAWRENCE.  

What is the story here? The woman was complaining that her intimate porn photos were stolen and splattered all over the Internet. 

Yes, like many others, she and her boyfriend were simply enjoying the fun of porn-type picture taking. But once everyone could see the pictures...she was OFFENDED. 

Except she didn't say: "I'm contacting EVERY lawyer who has a client abused by 4CHAN or CELEBJIHAD, and I'm gonna make sure those sites are either CLOSED or BLOCKED."  

NOPE.  She didn't say: "I'm going to make sure EBAY SELLERS don't profit off these images...or the FAKE ones they already sell." 

To compound the insanity, take a look at THIS: 

Yes, JENNY  is quoted in ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY as saying "there's a difference between consent and not..."  

Really? Is that why the JENNIFER LAWRENCE pictures are ALL OVER EBAY? 

Many eBAY SELLERS have been shut down, NO THANKS TO JENNIFER LAWERENCE.

Her quote was in reference to...you guessed it...DOING A NUDE SCENE IN A MOVIE. A nude scene that will be freeze-framed and SOLD not as "Jennifer Lawrence, playing a character" but JENNIFER LAWRENCE.

There are sellers using eBay's nefarious ADULT section who specialize in doing screen captures of movie scenes AND SELLING THEM. This is against the law. Against copyright law. Against intellectual property law. But eBay shrugs and says "Let the movie studio send in a DMCA. Let Jennifer Lawrence send in a DMCA." And does she? 

Is it because she doesn't KNOW about the problem? Or doesn't care? 

JUNE, 2018, and here's what EBAY SELLERS have in EBAY'S sneaky "adults only" category: fake nudes, and even NUDE SHOTS THAT CLAIM JENNIFER LAWRENCE SIGNED THE PHOTOS.

The METOO movement means exactly those two words. ME TOO.  

That means that celebrities should at least have a trusted fan to run a FACEBOOK or TWITTER page for free, and be able to monitor problems and get input. 

Celebrities should know that they are being stabbed in the back by their agents and managers. These slime don't care if a Jennifer Lawrence or Jennifer Aniston gets abused on eBAY. Not unless their Jennifer is willing to pay them $200 an hour to send in the DMCA that an intern could do for a minute and for free.

Managers and agents love to go out for two hour lunches, take a long weekend on a cruise, and stare at their "Living Well is the Best Revenge" sign on the wall. They don't even understand that their cash cow could be killed by a stalker (like Rebecca Schaefer was) and that it's dangerous to be wrapped in cotton and ignore problems. 

Being part of ME TOO is to know about the problem and to contact vero@ebay.com and say, "I have authorized my friend...my fan...my mom...whoever...to send in DMCA's. So when you get them, GET THIS STUFF OFF YOUR SITE AND SUSPEND THE SELLERS INVOLVED." 

Here's a statement that is short and simple and needs repeating because you don't seem to understand it:  

IF YOU'RE NOT PART OF THE SOLUTION YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM   

EBAY: TIMES UP. STOP THE WOMAN HATE. OBEY FEDERAL LAW

pkc527

THIS SMELLER...er, SELLER...offers 100's of fake nudes on every celebrity he can get his slimy paws on. He's a cheap sociopathic bastard, debasing women for CHUMP CHANGE.

He should be in jail. He should not be on eBAY. 

EBAY, when will you realize TIMES UP...or does CEO DEVIN WENIG have to be hauled in front of the cameras to answer for his misogyny? 

ACT LIKE YOU'RE ACTUALLY COMPETITION FOR AMAZON, and NOT FOR CELEBJIHAD.

ASHLEY JUDD says "ONLINE SEXUAL ABUSE" HAS SPIRALED. Ignores EBAY

What's with ASHLEY JUDD?

What's with #METOO, and #TIMESUP? 

It seems they'd rather go to TRIBECA and stand around on stage in pussy hats, and be sponsored by Johnson and Johnson feminine hygiene products, and TALK about problems. AND NOT DO ANYTHING.

ASHLEY JUDD, LOOK AT THESE EBAY PIMPS SEXUALLY ABUSING YOU FOR MONEY. THEY DO IT BECAUSE 

a) YOU LET THEM
and
b) YOU and your POWERFUL FEMALE CELEBRITY FRIENDS HAVE NOT TREATED EBAY CEO DEVIN WENIG LIKE ANOTHER HARVEY WEINSTEIN. 

WENIG HAS YET TO PUT "FAKE CELEBRITY NUDES" OR "NUDE IMAGES OF A WOMAN WITHOUT A STATED MODEL RELEASE OF AGE AND CONSENT" AS A REASON TO "REPORT ITEM." 

Meaning, anyone who reports the ASHLEY JUDD images below, has to report them to the "OFFENSIVE MATERIALS" category, where some moron in an eBay boiler room shrugs and thinks, "Not offensive to ME." 

Call up EBAY directly, 1-866-540-3229, and somebody in Asia somewhere will say, "Oh, this is against our policy. I will report this, not to worry." Ask, "WHO are you reporting it to" and "CAN YOU FOLLOW UP" and you get enough waffling to open your own pancake house. 

These four sellers should be suspended. They should NOT have 100's of similar fakes, and stolen images from copyrighted R-rated movies, that they sell. There are other eBay sellers in the adult area who have THOUSANDS of stolen downloaded images of revenge porn. They have NO permission, NO signed model releases of age and consent, and DEVIN WENIG, CEO OF EBAY, is being HARVEY WEINSTEIN ABOUT IT. Nobody gets him on the phone. Nobody pickets his office in San Jose. He's free to ABUSE WOMEN.

Speeches? REALLY? 

What Ashley Judd, Sally Field, Jane Fonda and the others should do, is simple: 

GET A VERO REP to send a DMCA to vero@ebay.com. That's the "verified rights owner" division of eBay.  

AND...get some supposedly smart, motivated WOMAN like, oh, GLORIA ALLRED, to lobby the two female senators in California to make EBAY obey FEDERAL LAW. Because it's illegal to sell x-rated material without a MODEL RELEASE.

GLORIA ALLRED, or some other VERY SMART WOMAN should file a lawsuit against eBAY demanding that they make sure that ANYONE can report an obvious violation and have the item REMOVED. 

Yes, eBay is "just a venue," and can't monitor every auction, but they CAN and SHOULD suspend repeat offenders, warn sellers NOT to sell nude images without a woman's consent, and see to it that if a seller says "I have a model release," that the seller MUST PROVE IT. 

EBAY is fostering an environment of disrespect and misogyny and it MUST STOP. This site has been trying, and TRYING to get changes made, and yet, here are FOUR SELLERS blithely offering nude images on Ashley Judd as if they are ENTITLED.

LYNDA CARTER - Me Too or NOT Me Too?

Lynda Carter is aware of the fake nudes on eBay. She does nothing about them.

She knows she can have a VeRO (verified rights owner) rep FREE, who will scan the site for her and take down images she might not even want to see. She does nothing. 

When a woman does nothing about taunts, innuendo or abuse, she is saying, "It's all right." IS IT? IS IT, LYNDA CARTER? Is THIS really all right with you?  

Lynda Carter's apathy is allowing two obnoxious eBay dealers to thrive and abuse hundreds of actresses. These dealers, who know which stars NOT to DARE sell, make money by abusing ones who "ask for it." 

Lynda Carter is ASKING FOR IT by NOT STOPPING IT. And yet, she is one of those who suddenly cries "ME TOO!" She suddenly declares that there's a downside to being a sex symbol. Or is there? She isn't exactly naming names, and she's still indicating that she, and most women, usually just look the other way because it's easier. 

A lot of mixed messages here. Some say that actresses simply aren't very bright, and that pretty women learn early on that they don't need to study, be articulate, or do anything but smile and be submissive to get ahead. That's just sad. But read for yourself, Lynda "Me Too" Carter, taking very limited action and therefore, letting the problem remain

"She's NEVER REPORTED SOMEONE," but apparently someone did complain about the guy who was drilling holes to peep into dressing rooms on the Warner Brothers lot. There wasn't a lot that Lynda did to make that firing happen sooner, huh? 

In a similar article on her complaints, the New York Post declared that she actually did complain about the cameraman who drilled the hole in her dressing room, but that she generally ignored suggestive remarks, and worried about being "blacklisted" if she complained about abuse. And what's she doing now? Allowing abuse. What's going on with eBay, a big company that will NOT make sure its sellers have SIGNED MODEL RELEASES OF AGE AND CONSENT, is abuse. 

It's rather ironic that the female who played "Wonder Woman" is so muddled and passive. There are dozens of actresses who are real heroines and that includes taking the time to assign a secretary or a webmaster or a fan to be their VeRO rep, and take a minute to take down offensive photos. 

A reminder: ALL that is needed to get misogynistic, obnoxious photos of any celebrity off eBay, is for the celebrity to send, on letterhead, authorization: "I authorize this fan, this lawyer, this webmaster, this relative of mine...to take the ONE minute to cut and paste the number of the auction and send it to vero@ebay.com." Thank you.

Here's Lynda Carter in the New York Post, letting us know that her husband is surprised that there's mistreatment going on. Mr. Carter (or however you want to be addressed) how do YOU feel about guys in eBay selling fake nudes of your wife? 

Meanwhile, some perverts, some woman-haters, some drug addicts...are saying "thank you, Lynda Carter, for letting us sell counterfeits and fakes on eBay and make a lazy living off your face on somebody else's naked body." 

Who is more MORAL, Pornbay or Ebay? PORNOBAY

Fake nudes of celebrities?  

PORN SITES that offer TORRENTS (illegal, bootleg material) are moral enough to draw the line at FAKE NUDES. Ebay is NOT moral enough to do it.  

Proof? 

As of today, here's the front page of PORNBAY, one of the main sites where free downloads of copyrighted material are available. They say NO to the fake nudes:  

"After some consideration, it has been decided for now to not permit the "Deepfakes" videos....it is not consensual and as such falls under that section of the Forbidden List. It is the opinion of the staff that these are too invasive on the persons who are being digitally added to the actual porn..."  


Yes,  PORNBAY has the integrity to have a "Forbidden List." EBAY?  

DEVIN WENIG, the CEO of EBAY has not officially stated EBAY forbids "digitally added" heads of celebrities Photoshopped onto porn images. There is nothing that even forbids "non-consensual" photos from being posted, including "my ex-wife" and "my ex-girlfriend" revenge porn.  

While eBay phone support emphatically states that such images "are against our policy," you won't actually find it in writing on eBAY. This is what you see:  

Why DEVIN WENIG, CEO of EBAY, wants to be in the same category as HARVEY WEINSTEIN, ousted CEO of MIRAMAX, is hard to understand. 

What does DEVIN WENIG like about gangbang photos on the late Carrie Fisher? On pedophilia images of Emma Watson? On pictures the intentionally degrade and demean women for profit, with NO SIGNED MODEL RELEASE OF AGE OR CONSENT? 

Why is it that the guy who runs PORNBAY is showing more integrity, morality, fairness, and respect for women than the guy who runs EBAY? 

EBAY, in fact, allows a lot of nude images right out in the open, and not confined to their "adult" section. Report a topless celebrity image and it's not removed. Report a "Hustler"-type photo (and Hustler magazine IS restricted to the "adult" section) and it usually stays. 

The excuse if you call phone support is "we have millions of auctions..." and not enough staff to handle the complaints? Not enough staff who know an offensive item that should not be viewed by a 12 year-old typing "nude photo" into the search engine? Really? 

Here's EBAY's rule page on nude photos: 

A very strange quirk with eBay is that in their adult section, there are plenty of images of sadism and masochism, and none are ever removed. Should they be? Not if it involves consenting adults. It's a topic not far removed from pudgy E.L. James' hit "50 Shades" movies. If men or women want to be abused, and get paid for it, and SIGN A MODEL RELEASE, fine.

The difference is that JANE FONDA, for one example (and you can find hundreds on this site) did NOT sign a model release for this obvious fake picture, and the seller should either be suspended, or forbidden from EVER selling anything similar on ANY famous woman. 

No signed model release? NO SALE. It should be as simple as that.

If PORNOBAY draws the line on digital fakes of celebrities, WHAT IS WRONG WITH EBAY? Does DEVIN WENIG not know what's going on? Are the various people in phone support and other divisions of eBay afraid to ask him to STOP ABUSING WOMEN FOR PROFIT? 

Lisa Bloom, Walter Mosley -- can you spell...EBAY?

Today's news involves Blac Chyna, who is upset because a porn video she made "leaked." 

Her lawyer, Lisa Bloom, screams that "posting explicit images without the consent of everyone in those images is a crime." 

Her other attorney, Walter Mosley, aks "why do we think it's acceptable to sell, or publish...or blackmail women this way and without their consent? 

So, Lisa and Walter, are you saying that Blac Chyna autographed THIS photo of herself? 

Odds are it's a forgery. After all, this seller just HAPPENS to have hundreds of autographed nude pictures of celebrities he's hidden in the "adult" area of eBay, and how many women go around autographing nude pictures and fake nude pictures of themselves? 

Lisa Bloom and Walter Mosley might want to consider a class action lawsuit on behalf of ALL women whose photos are being sold on eBay WITH NO MODEL RELEASE OF AGE OR CONSENT.

Or do they only work for high-priced celebrities who pay $1000 an hour? Does it mean Blac Chyna doesn't want to spend $1000 in billing hours to have the above item removed from eBay? 

And does that mean that they can't ask an intern or a secretary to spend TWO MINUTES and send in a DMCA on a Blac Chyna "signed" nude image? 

It's a FEDERAL LAW that pornographers MUST have a SIGNED MODEL RELEASE of AGE and CONSENT. You see this on every porn DVD, on every porn website, on every adult magazine on the newsstand: "All models are of legal age and signed forms are on file at our office." 

That's not the case with eBay sellers. Why doesn't Lisa Bloom and Walter Mosley call a press conference about this? They don't know? THEY DO NOW. 

A Necrophile Misogynist Defiles NATALIE WOOD

It's EBAY...so why not sell a FAKE NUDE of NATALIE WOOD? 

She's in the news. Her grieving sister Lana Wood was on Dr. Oz recently. Go ahead, sell a fake nude of NATALIE WOOD. And one on Lana, as well:

Would you believe it...after all this time, after #METOO and "TIME'S UP" and eBay STILL does not have a way of reporting offensive misogynist monsters like THIS guy? 

Right now, the only options remain: use "REPORT ITEM" and send the auction link to "ADULT: NOT ALLOWED AT ALL" or "OFFENSIVE MATERIALS" and hope that somebody at eBay agrees with you.

Devin Wenig, the CEO of eBay is not as bad as Harvey Weinstein. IS HE? 

Try calling up eBay 1 (866) 540-3229

You will get some happy-voiced fool in Pakistan somewhere, who will say "Not to worry," and agree with you, "This is against our policy." Next, "I will forward the complaint." 

You say, "Why can't YOU remove this auction?" "Oh that's not my department. NOT TO WORRY. I will forward this auction to the right party." "Can I speak to the right party directly?" "NOT TO WORRY, our procedure is proper. And no, you can't call back and ask for ME personally. And no, I can NOT give you an email address or a follow-up complaint number..."

Which means that most of the time, the complaint you've called in will either NOT be forwarded at all, all be forwarded to someone who thinks that misogynistic abuses of women is OK. The auction will not be removed. 

Who else is this seller currently abusing? 

As well as:

Lynda Carter
Cindy Crawford
Elizabeth Hurley
Jaclyn Smith
Morgan Fairchild
Kate Upton
Heather Locklear
Loni Anderson

AND...

and

Sarah Michelle Geller
Sandra Bullock
Cassandra Peterson (Elvira)
Amanda Bynes
Natalie Dormer
Denise Richards
Victoria Principal
Hillary Duff
Sheree North
Christy Brinkley
Jeri Ryan

and the list goes on.

#METOO is the number of stupid, or uninformed women who have NOT YET CONTACTED vero@ebay.com to register (free) and be able to do takedowns on this crap.

EBAY should make sure that there's a REAL "report item" link that will instantly remove these illegal auctions that have NO MODEL RELEASE OF AGE AND CONSENT.