Paypal and Ebay - WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER "OFFENSIVE"

In the real world "offensive" and "obscene" are easy to define.

In the Scientology-type compounds of Internet giants, where soulless businessmen get golden parachutes for helming places like PAYPAL and EBAY, the definition blurs. 

Don't YOU tell a businessman what is "offensive" and "obscene" when he's making money off it. 

According to PAYPAL and EBAY, these images are not "offensive" or "obscene" and do not violate their "Terms of Service." 

A "fantasy" image of Jennifer Aniston being tied up and raped by a machine.

This "fantasy" image of Anne Hathaway, with Photoshopped mascara-tears running down her face, being gang banged and humiliated.

Images devised by psychotic basement-dwelling woman-haters are downloaded and sold on EBAY.

The sellers didn't make the images. They just decided he's easy money. Here's a way to be a pimp and make money off successful women who don't deserve respect.

Check other articles, including the one on MELANIA AND IVANKA TRUMP, which includes THIS picture that "Jose Mo" is snickering about making money on: 

In the sneaky hidden "adults only" area of eBay, Hathaway and Aniston and the others aren't likely to see this stuff. But maybe they will, when a deranged bidder asks them to autograph the image, or simply stalks them, because degrading rape images aren't enough. 

The tragedy is that if women pictures complained, and got the items removed (eBay removes "intellectual property" violations), the seller would be free to abuse 100 other women. Ebay's logic is that just because a few women complained about visual rape, it doesn't mean the seller doesn't have deals with the others. And they won't ask him to show a signed model release of age or consent. 

PEDOPHILIA is fine with EBAY. Maybe Emma Watson was only 16 and her face was slashed off and put on a porn body also underage. Only Emma Watson can have this item removed because EBAY (and PAYPAL) don't consider the image Obscene or Offensive. 

Do you suppose a woman working at PAYPAL or EBAY would find it "offensive" if somebody put their head on the body of a tortured naked woman with her breasts in bondage? Maybe? 

You can be sure that in the sanctified halls of EBAY offices in Draper, UTAH and San Jose, CALIFORNIA, no guy could pass along a photo of a female eBay employee like the ones you see here, and expect to keep his job. 

Or wouldn't you want to work at EBAY or PAYPAL to find out? EBAY and PAYPAL seem to be as nefarious as SCIENTOLOGY, don't they? They don't want ANYONE to tell them what to do. They hide their identities and contact information. 

Store owners and business owners have offices you can visit and call. You can speak to someone in charge. Not so with PAYPAL and EBAY. 

Except...PAYPAL AND EBAY are still located in the United States, not RUSSIA. There is the matter of law. It is against the law to sell pornographic images without a model release. 

ACLU. Justice Department. President's Office. 

When will EBAY specifically declare that "celebrity nudes" are offensive materials, and that NO seller of amateur porn in the "secret adult section" can do so without signed model releases on file? Is class action and a multi-million dollar lawsuit the answer to their obnoxious apathy and/or Fascistic stubborn refusal to be moral?