How do you stop "REVENGE PORN?"
It should be EASY on EBAY: insist that only professionally made porn is allowed. That means the magazines and DVDs from companies that COMPLY WITH FEDERAL LAW and have a SIGNED DOCUMENT OF AGE AND CONSENT ON FILE.
Do THESE two eBay sellers say they comply? NO, THEY DO NOT. They pretend to have "found" pictures of naked women and so they decide they'll sell them WITHOUT CONSENT. They take "Revenge Porn" off the Internet, download it, grind it through a printer on photo paper, and don't care who they embarrass and humiliate.
"I took the photo" isn't the same as "I have a signed model release." "Found" photo isn't the same as AUTHORIZED.
Ebay has, ever since it arrived, played the game of letting parasites copy off any photo they please. They make dupes of copyrighted images, of celebrity photos, and then it's up to the copyright owner to spend hours a week checking eBay for violations and submitting a DMCA. Celebrities often have to pay "Grayzone" and "Web Sheriff" outfits hundreds of dollars to protect themselves from Photoshop fakes that insane fans think are real. "Hey here's this spread shot of you, please sign it..." or "I saw you do it with a bunch of guys in a photo somebody was selling on eBay. I know where you live and I will be coming over. You will do it with me or else..."
EBAY should not be encouraging stalking, invasion of privacy, or REBECCA SCHAEFFER tragedies. Who was Rebecca Schaeffer? She was on the CBS sitcom "My Sister Sam" and she was SHOT and KILLED by "a fan who had been stalking her." That quote is from Wikipedia: "a fan who had been stalking her."
Ebay's reckless allowance of Photoshop fakes on celebrities, and "girlfriend" and revenge porn on ANY AND EVERY WOMAN....must STOP. It shouldn't be up to you, your mother, somebody's wife, somebody's sister to check EBAY, of all places, to see if somebody is faking a nude picture or selling something stolen or otherwise unauthorized.
EBAY needs to have a simple rule: if it's NOT professionally made, it's NOT ALLOWED. The irony is that EBAY has a half-assed rule against amateur VIDEOS (not photos) and against "voyeur" and "upskirt" iimages, but not junk like the two items below.
Tuesday, July 10, 2018
Wednesday, July 4, 2018
EBAY SUPPORTS SEXUAL PREDATORS AND RAPISTS?
The mark of a SEXUAL PREDATOR is a sociopathic hatred.
The Rapist is not about gratification, but ABUSE. MISOGYNY. CONTROL. HUMILIATION.
This sickness knows NO boundaries of AGE. The female victim can be 8 or 80. The DEAD are not immune. Women already wounded are victims AGAIN.
On EBAY, which supposedly no longer allows violations of FEDERAL LAW, and the sale of amateur videos and photos that have NO model release of AGE or CONSENT on file, CONTINUES to allow sellers to be SEXUAL PREDATORS.
You'd think that after a seller has been reported, EBAY would do the right thing. But AWESOMEPHOTOS, a sick predator in Louisiana is STILL on the site, and STILL targeting EVERY woman.
PRINCESS DIANA. DEAD. Still a target, as is Carrie Fisher.
EMMA WATSON. Underage Photoshop jobs. PEDOPHILE PORN. Still a target.
ACTRESSES AND SINGERS OF ALL TYPES...ALL OF THEM VICTIMS.
Monica Lewinsky, considered by some to be a martyr in the #METOO movement, still the subject of lewd humiliation. ALL of the items below, and HUNDREDS MORE, are on EBAY right now, JULY 5th, being sold by AWESOMEPHOTOS.
It is incredible that this is happening. EBAY, which has indeed suspended many sellers, has allowed THIS one to keep going beyond ANY LOGIC. Is this just another example of an arrogant, powerful Internet company refusing to do the right thing because IT doesn't want to be BULLIED?
"Report Item" isn't enough? Saying PLEASE isn't enough? Actresses sending in DMCA's isn't enough? Why do faceless INTERNET GIANTS act with such cruelty and disdain? WHY, when the world should be saying NEVER AGAIN to a Harvey Weinstein, and some companies fire people who have merely been ACCUSED of inappropriate touching, EBAY doesn't instantly act on a seller who does NOTHING but offer obnoxious PHOTOSHOP FAKES?
What is the point here? It's a RAPIST'S ATTITUDE of hatred and degradation. The idea isn't to arouse, it's to make fun of Princess Diana and Kathy Lee Gifford, and to turn international famous and rich women such as Emma Watson into meek, ridiculous sexual slaves and sluts...all for the fantasy of SEXUAL PREDATORS, SICK PEOPLE and DERANGED WOMAN HATERS.
Will EBAY'S DEVIN WENIG face the CAMERAS and say "I will NO LONGER ALLOW THIS on my watch?" Will be wait to be PROSECUTED LIKE KIM DOTCOM? Why is it that companies such as Google who profess to "do no harm" and strive to make the world better by technology, FAIL so miserably? Why is it that a helpful, prosperous, GIANT company like EBAY wants to protect somebody who degrades women?
FACE IT, if this seller did this kind of things to BLACKS or MUSLIMS, he'd be GONE instantly. EBAY has a specific rule against using slurs against racial and religious groups...but WOMEN deserve protection too.
The Rapist is not about gratification, but ABUSE. MISOGYNY. CONTROL. HUMILIATION.
This sickness knows NO boundaries of AGE. The female victim can be 8 or 80. The DEAD are not immune. Women already wounded are victims AGAIN.
On EBAY, which supposedly no longer allows violations of FEDERAL LAW, and the sale of amateur videos and photos that have NO model release of AGE or CONSENT on file, CONTINUES to allow sellers to be SEXUAL PREDATORS.
You'd think that after a seller has been reported, EBAY would do the right thing. But AWESOMEPHOTOS, a sick predator in Louisiana is STILL on the site, and STILL targeting EVERY woman.
PRINCESS DIANA. DEAD. Still a target, as is Carrie Fisher.
EMMA WATSON. Underage Photoshop jobs. PEDOPHILE PORN. Still a target.
ACTRESSES AND SINGERS OF ALL TYPES...ALL OF THEM VICTIMS.
Monica Lewinsky, considered by some to be a martyr in the #METOO movement, still the subject of lewd humiliation. ALL of the items below, and HUNDREDS MORE, are on EBAY right now, JULY 5th, being sold by AWESOMEPHOTOS.
It is incredible that this is happening. EBAY, which has indeed suspended many sellers, has allowed THIS one to keep going beyond ANY LOGIC. Is this just another example of an arrogant, powerful Internet company refusing to do the right thing because IT doesn't want to be BULLIED?
"Report Item" isn't enough? Saying PLEASE isn't enough? Actresses sending in DMCA's isn't enough? Why do faceless INTERNET GIANTS act with such cruelty and disdain? WHY, when the world should be saying NEVER AGAIN to a Harvey Weinstein, and some companies fire people who have merely been ACCUSED of inappropriate touching, EBAY doesn't instantly act on a seller who does NOTHING but offer obnoxious PHOTOSHOP FAKES?
What is the point here? It's a RAPIST'S ATTITUDE of hatred and degradation. The idea isn't to arouse, it's to make fun of Princess Diana and Kathy Lee Gifford, and to turn international famous and rich women such as Emma Watson into meek, ridiculous sexual slaves and sluts...all for the fantasy of SEXUAL PREDATORS, SICK PEOPLE and DERANGED WOMAN HATERS.
Will EBAY'S DEVIN WENIG face the CAMERAS and say "I will NO LONGER ALLOW THIS on my watch?" Will be wait to be PROSECUTED LIKE KIM DOTCOM? Why is it that companies such as Google who profess to "do no harm" and strive to make the world better by technology, FAIL so miserably? Why is it that a helpful, prosperous, GIANT company like EBAY wants to protect somebody who degrades women?
FACE IT, if this seller did this kind of things to BLACKS or MUSLIMS, he'd be GONE instantly. EBAY has a specific rule against using slurs against racial and religious groups...but WOMEN deserve protection too.
Tuesday, June 12, 2018
ASHLEY JUDD is more concerned with MONKEYS than with ME TOO - You can do BOTH, ASHLEY
ASHLEY JUDD.
Another idiot. ASHLEY JUDD is one of the vocal METOO people. She's OFFENDED by this. OFFENDED by THAT.
Ashley doesn't want mean ol' producers or directors being suggestive and wanting a little YES action to go with saying YES to one woman over 20 others that could do the job just as well.
BUT...ASHLEY JUDD (or her manager, her agent, and her Twitter stooge) have ignored everyone who has said, "You can send a DMCA and get rid of the unauthorized nudes on eBay...you can be a METOO and help get these creeps suspended."
This is the same ASHLEY JUDD who expects the law to pay attention to HER when she complains that Harvey Weinstein was crude to her. Ashley, how does it feel when nobody pays attention to YOUR moral complaint? YOU are allowing idiots in eBay to prosper. Harvey Weinstein is out of business. THEY ARE NOT.
Is this a fake ASHLEY JUDD picture or a real one? Does it matter? She isn't being paid, these are bootlegs and unauthorized, the sellers have no model releases, and they have HUNDREDS of other pictures, most DEFINITELY faked, that help them get beer and potato chip money as they sit around their white trash trailers beating up women and and being anti-social monsters.
These, and dozens of screencaps from movies and fake shots...are in eBay's sleazy secret "adults only" section. If Ashley Judd simply authorized a FAN or a RELATIVE or a SECRETARY to take ONE MINUTE to send in a DMCA, this junk would be gone and most likely, the sellers would either be gone, or on their way to the suspensions they deserve.
Most eBay sellers who get suspended CAN'T come back, because it's tough to get a new address and phone number and bank account and name! An email to vero@ebay.com works ONLY if there's an authorized document on file. There obviously isn't one for ASHLEY JUDD.
Yes, we have JUDD FOR THE DEFENSE of MONKEYS...she does THAT with her Tweetie-Tweets. She does NOT, as YET, say METOO to removing eBay photos, as Taylor Swift and dozens upon dozens of other women do.
Here's ASHLEY, monkeying around instead
Another idiot. ASHLEY JUDD is one of the vocal METOO people. She's OFFENDED by this. OFFENDED by THAT.
Ashley doesn't want mean ol' producers or directors being suggestive and wanting a little YES action to go with saying YES to one woman over 20 others that could do the job just as well.
BUT...ASHLEY JUDD (or her manager, her agent, and her Twitter stooge) have ignored everyone who has said, "You can send a DMCA and get rid of the unauthorized nudes on eBay...you can be a METOO and help get these creeps suspended."
This is the same ASHLEY JUDD who expects the law to pay attention to HER when she complains that Harvey Weinstein was crude to her. Ashley, how does it feel when nobody pays attention to YOUR moral complaint? YOU are allowing idiots in eBay to prosper. Harvey Weinstein is out of business. THEY ARE NOT.
Is this a fake ASHLEY JUDD picture or a real one? Does it matter? She isn't being paid, these are bootlegs and unauthorized, the sellers have no model releases, and they have HUNDREDS of other pictures, most DEFINITELY faked, that help them get beer and potato chip money as they sit around their white trash trailers beating up women and and being anti-social monsters.
These, and dozens of screencaps from movies and fake shots...are in eBay's sleazy secret "adults only" section. If Ashley Judd simply authorized a FAN or a RELATIVE or a SECRETARY to take ONE MINUTE to send in a DMCA, this junk would be gone and most likely, the sellers would either be gone, or on their way to the suspensions they deserve.
Most eBay sellers who get suspended CAN'T come back, because it's tough to get a new address and phone number and bank account and name! An email to vero@ebay.com works ONLY if there's an authorized document on file. There obviously isn't one for ASHLEY JUDD.
Yes, we have JUDD FOR THE DEFENSE of MONKEYS...she does THAT with her Tweetie-Tweets. She does NOT, as YET, say METOO to removing eBay photos, as Taylor Swift and dozens upon dozens of other women do.
Here's ASHLEY, monkeying around instead
JENNIFER LAWRENCE - What IS the STORY?
JENNIFER LAWRENCE.
What is the story here? The woman was complaining that her intimate porn photos were stolen and splattered all over the Internet.
Yes, like many others, she and her boyfriend were simply enjoying the fun of porn-type picture taking. But once everyone could see the pictures...she was OFFENDED.
Except she didn't say: "I'm contacting EVERY lawyer who has a client abused by 4CHAN or CELEBJIHAD, and I'm gonna make sure those sites are either CLOSED or BLOCKED."
NOPE. She didn't say: "I'm going to make sure EBAY SELLERS don't profit off these images...or the FAKE ones they already sell."
To compound the insanity, take a look at THIS:
The METOO movement means exactly those two words. ME TOO.
That means that celebrities should at least have a trusted fan to run a FACEBOOK or TWITTER page for free, and be able to monitor problems and get input.
Celebrities should know that they are being stabbed in the back by their agents and managers. These slime don't care if a Jennifer Lawrence or Jennifer Aniston gets abused on eBAY. Not unless their Jennifer is willing to pay them $200 an hour to send in the DMCA that an intern could do for a minute and for free.
Managers and agents love to go out for two hour lunches, take a long weekend on a cruise, and stare at their "Living Well is the Best Revenge" sign on the wall. They don't even understand that their cash cow could be killed by a stalker (like Rebecca Schaefer was) and that it's dangerous to be wrapped in cotton and ignore problems.
Being part of ME TOO is to know about the problem and to contact vero@ebay.com and say, "I have authorized my friend...my fan...my mom...whoever...to send in DMCA's. So when you get them, GET THIS STUFF OFF YOUR SITE AND SUSPEND THE SELLERS INVOLVED."
Here's a statement that is short and simple and needs repeating because you don't seem to understand it:
IF YOU'RE NOT PART OF THE SOLUTION YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM
What is the story here? The woman was complaining that her intimate porn photos were stolen and splattered all over the Internet.
Yes, like many others, she and her boyfriend were simply enjoying the fun of porn-type picture taking. But once everyone could see the pictures...she was OFFENDED.
Except she didn't say: "I'm contacting EVERY lawyer who has a client abused by 4CHAN or CELEBJIHAD, and I'm gonna make sure those sites are either CLOSED or BLOCKED."
NOPE. She didn't say: "I'm going to make sure EBAY SELLERS don't profit off these images...or the FAKE ones they already sell."
To compound the insanity, take a look at THIS:
Yes, JENNY is quoted in ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY as saying "there's a difference between consent and not..."
Really? Is that why the JENNIFER LAWRENCE pictures are ALL OVER EBAY?
Many eBAY SELLERS have been shut down, NO THANKS TO JENNIFER LAWERENCE.
Her quote was in reference to...you guessed it...DOING A NUDE SCENE IN A MOVIE. A nude scene that will be freeze-framed and SOLD not as "Jennifer Lawrence, playing a character" but JENNIFER LAWRENCE.
There are sellers using eBay's nefarious ADULT section who specialize in doing screen captures of movie scenes AND SELLING THEM. This is against the law. Against copyright law. Against intellectual property law. But eBay shrugs and says "Let the movie studio send in a DMCA. Let Jennifer Lawrence send in a DMCA." And does she?
Is it because she doesn't KNOW about the problem? Or doesn't care?
JUNE, 2018, and here's what EBAY SELLERS have in EBAY'S sneaky "adults only" category: fake nudes, and even NUDE SHOTS THAT CLAIM JENNIFER LAWRENCE SIGNED THE PHOTOS.
The METOO movement means exactly those two words. ME TOO.
That means that celebrities should at least have a trusted fan to run a FACEBOOK or TWITTER page for free, and be able to monitor problems and get input.
Celebrities should know that they are being stabbed in the back by their agents and managers. These slime don't care if a Jennifer Lawrence or Jennifer Aniston gets abused on eBAY. Not unless their Jennifer is willing to pay them $200 an hour to send in the DMCA that an intern could do for a minute and for free.
Managers and agents love to go out for two hour lunches, take a long weekend on a cruise, and stare at their "Living Well is the Best Revenge" sign on the wall. They don't even understand that their cash cow could be killed by a stalker (like Rebecca Schaefer was) and that it's dangerous to be wrapped in cotton and ignore problems.
Being part of ME TOO is to know about the problem and to contact vero@ebay.com and say, "I have authorized my friend...my fan...my mom...whoever...to send in DMCA's. So when you get them, GET THIS STUFF OFF YOUR SITE AND SUSPEND THE SELLERS INVOLVED."
Here's a statement that is short and simple and needs repeating because you don't seem to understand it:
IF YOU'RE NOT PART OF THE SOLUTION YOU'RE PART OF THE PROBLEM
Saturday, April 28, 2018
EBAY: TIMES UP. STOP THE WOMAN HATE. OBEY FEDERAL LAW
pkc527
THIS SMELLER...er, SELLER...offers 100's of fake nudes on every celebrity he can get his slimy paws on. He's a cheap sociopathic bastard, debasing women for CHUMP CHANGE.
He should be in jail. He should not be on eBAY.
EBAY, when will you realize TIMES UP...or does CEO DEVIN WENIG have to be hauled in front of the cameras to answer for his misogyny?
ACT LIKE YOU'RE ACTUALLY COMPETITION FOR AMAZON, and NOT FOR CELEBJIHAD.
THIS SMELLER...er, SELLER...offers 100's of fake nudes on every celebrity he can get his slimy paws on. He's a cheap sociopathic bastard, debasing women for CHUMP CHANGE.
He should be in jail. He should not be on eBAY.
EBAY, when will you realize TIMES UP...or does CEO DEVIN WENIG have to be hauled in front of the cameras to answer for his misogyny?
ACT LIKE YOU'RE ACTUALLY COMPETITION FOR AMAZON, and NOT FOR CELEBJIHAD.
ASHLEY JUDD says "ONLINE SEXUAL ABUSE" HAS SPIRALED. Ignores EBAY
What's with ASHLEY JUDD?
What's with #METOO, and #TIMESUP?
It seems they'd rather go to TRIBECA and stand around on stage in pussy hats, and be sponsored by Johnson and Johnson feminine hygiene products, and TALK about problems. AND NOT DO ANYTHING.
ASHLEY JUDD, LOOK AT THESE EBAY PIMPS SEXUALLY ABUSING YOU FOR MONEY. THEY DO IT BECAUSE
a) YOU LET THEM
and
b) YOU and your POWERFUL FEMALE CELEBRITY FRIENDS HAVE NOT TREATED EBAY CEO DEVIN WENIG LIKE ANOTHER HARVEY WEINSTEIN.
WENIG HAS YET TO PUT "FAKE CELEBRITY NUDES" OR "NUDE IMAGES OF A WOMAN WITHOUT A STATED MODEL RELEASE OF AGE AND CONSENT" AS A REASON TO "REPORT ITEM."
Meaning, anyone who reports the ASHLEY JUDD images below, has to report them to the "OFFENSIVE MATERIALS" category, where some moron in an eBay boiler room shrugs and thinks, "Not offensive to ME."
Call up EBAY directly, 1-866-540-3229, and somebody in Asia somewhere will say, "Oh, this is against our policy. I will report this, not to worry." Ask, "WHO are you reporting it to" and "CAN YOU FOLLOW UP" and you get enough waffling to open your own pancake house.
These four sellers should be suspended. They should NOT have 100's of similar fakes, and stolen images from copyrighted R-rated movies, that they sell. There are other eBay sellers in the adult area who have THOUSANDS of stolen downloaded images of revenge porn. They have NO permission, NO signed model releases of age and consent, and DEVIN WENIG, CEO OF EBAY, is being HARVEY WEINSTEIN ABOUT IT. Nobody gets him on the phone. Nobody pickets his office in San Jose. He's free to ABUSE WOMEN.
Speeches? REALLY?
What's with #METOO, and #TIMESUP?
It seems they'd rather go to TRIBECA and stand around on stage in pussy hats, and be sponsored by Johnson and Johnson feminine hygiene products, and TALK about problems. AND NOT DO ANYTHING.
ASHLEY JUDD, LOOK AT THESE EBAY PIMPS SEXUALLY ABUSING YOU FOR MONEY. THEY DO IT BECAUSE
a) YOU LET THEM
and
b) YOU and your POWERFUL FEMALE CELEBRITY FRIENDS HAVE NOT TREATED EBAY CEO DEVIN WENIG LIKE ANOTHER HARVEY WEINSTEIN.
WENIG HAS YET TO PUT "FAKE CELEBRITY NUDES" OR "NUDE IMAGES OF A WOMAN WITHOUT A STATED MODEL RELEASE OF AGE AND CONSENT" AS A REASON TO "REPORT ITEM."
Meaning, anyone who reports the ASHLEY JUDD images below, has to report them to the "OFFENSIVE MATERIALS" category, where some moron in an eBay boiler room shrugs and thinks, "Not offensive to ME."
Call up EBAY directly, 1-866-540-3229, and somebody in Asia somewhere will say, "Oh, this is against our policy. I will report this, not to worry." Ask, "WHO are you reporting it to" and "CAN YOU FOLLOW UP" and you get enough waffling to open your own pancake house.
These four sellers should be suspended. They should NOT have 100's of similar fakes, and stolen images from copyrighted R-rated movies, that they sell. There are other eBay sellers in the adult area who have THOUSANDS of stolen downloaded images of revenge porn. They have NO permission, NO signed model releases of age and consent, and DEVIN WENIG, CEO OF EBAY, is being HARVEY WEINSTEIN ABOUT IT. Nobody gets him on the phone. Nobody pickets his office in San Jose. He's free to ABUSE WOMEN.
Speeches? REALLY?
What Ashley Judd, Sally Field, Jane Fonda and the others should do, is simple:
GET A VERO REP to send a DMCA to vero@ebay.com. That's the "verified rights owner" division of eBay.
AND...get some supposedly smart, motivated WOMAN like, oh, GLORIA ALLRED, to lobby the two female senators in California to make EBAY obey FEDERAL LAW. Because it's illegal to sell x-rated material without a MODEL RELEASE.
GLORIA ALLRED, or some other VERY SMART WOMAN should file a lawsuit against eBAY demanding that they make sure that ANYONE can report an obvious violation and have the item REMOVED.
Yes, eBay is "just a venue," and can't monitor every auction, but they CAN and SHOULD suspend repeat offenders, warn sellers NOT to sell nude images without a woman's consent, and see to it that if a seller says "I have a model release," that the seller MUST PROVE IT.
EBAY is fostering an environment of disrespect and misogyny and it MUST STOP. This site has been trying, and TRYING to get changes made, and yet, here are FOUR SELLERS blithely offering nude images on Ashley Judd as if they are ENTITLED.
Monday, March 12, 2018
LYNDA CARTER - Me Too or NOT Me Too?
Lynda Carter is aware of the fake nudes on eBay. She does nothing about them.
She knows she can have a VeRO (verified rights owner) rep FREE, who will scan the site for her and take down images she might not even want to see. She does nothing.
When a woman does nothing about taunts, innuendo or abuse, she is saying, "It's all right." IS IT? IS IT, LYNDA CARTER? Is THIS really all right with you?
Lynda Carter's apathy is allowing two obnoxious eBay dealers to thrive and abuse hundreds of actresses. These dealers, who know which stars NOT to DARE sell, make money by abusing ones who "ask for it."
Lynda Carter is ASKING FOR IT by NOT STOPPING IT. And yet, she is one of those who suddenly cries "ME TOO!" She suddenly declares that there's a downside to being a sex symbol. Or is there? She isn't exactly naming names, and she's still indicating that she, and most women, usually just look the other way because it's easier.
A lot of mixed messages here. Some say that actresses simply aren't very bright, and that pretty women learn early on that they don't need to study, be articulate, or do anything but smile and be submissive to get ahead. That's just sad. But read for yourself, Lynda "Me Too" Carter, taking very limited action and therefore, letting the problem remain
"She's NEVER REPORTED SOMEONE," but apparently someone did complain about the guy who was drilling holes to peep into dressing rooms on the Warner Brothers lot. There wasn't a lot that Lynda did to make that firing happen sooner, huh?
In a similar article on her complaints, the New York Post declared that she actually did complain about the cameraman who drilled the hole in her dressing room, but that she generally ignored suggestive remarks, and worried about being "blacklisted" if she complained about abuse. And what's she doing now? Allowing abuse. What's going on with eBay, a big company that will NOT make sure its sellers have SIGNED MODEL RELEASES OF AGE AND CONSENT, is abuse.
It's rather ironic that the female who played "Wonder Woman" is so muddled and passive. There are dozens of actresses who are real heroines and that includes taking the time to assign a secretary or a webmaster or a fan to be their VeRO rep, and take a minute to take down offensive photos.
A reminder: ALL that is needed to get misogynistic, obnoxious photos of any celebrity off eBay, is for the celebrity to send, on letterhead, authorization: "I authorize this fan, this lawyer, this webmaster, this relative of mine...to take the ONE minute to cut and paste the number of the auction and send it to vero@ebay.com." Thank you.
Here's Lynda Carter in the New York Post, letting us know that her husband is surprised that there's mistreatment going on. Mr. Carter (or however you want to be addressed) how do YOU feel about guys in eBay selling fake nudes of your wife?
Meanwhile, some perverts, some woman-haters, some drug addicts...are saying "thank you, Lynda Carter, for letting us sell counterfeits and fakes on eBay and make a lazy living off your face on somebody else's naked body."
She knows she can have a VeRO (verified rights owner) rep FREE, who will scan the site for her and take down images she might not even want to see. She does nothing.
When a woman does nothing about taunts, innuendo or abuse, she is saying, "It's all right." IS IT? IS IT, LYNDA CARTER? Is THIS really all right with you?
Lynda Carter's apathy is allowing two obnoxious eBay dealers to thrive and abuse hundreds of actresses. These dealers, who know which stars NOT to DARE sell, make money by abusing ones who "ask for it."
Lynda Carter is ASKING FOR IT by NOT STOPPING IT. And yet, she is one of those who suddenly cries "ME TOO!" She suddenly declares that there's a downside to being a sex symbol. Or is there? She isn't exactly naming names, and she's still indicating that she, and most women, usually just look the other way because it's easier.
A lot of mixed messages here. Some say that actresses simply aren't very bright, and that pretty women learn early on that they don't need to study, be articulate, or do anything but smile and be submissive to get ahead. That's just sad. But read for yourself, Lynda "Me Too" Carter, taking very limited action and therefore, letting the problem remain
"She's NEVER REPORTED SOMEONE," but apparently someone did complain about the guy who was drilling holes to peep into dressing rooms on the Warner Brothers lot. There wasn't a lot that Lynda did to make that firing happen sooner, huh?
In a similar article on her complaints, the New York Post declared that she actually did complain about the cameraman who drilled the hole in her dressing room, but that she generally ignored suggestive remarks, and worried about being "blacklisted" if she complained about abuse. And what's she doing now? Allowing abuse. What's going on with eBay, a big company that will NOT make sure its sellers have SIGNED MODEL RELEASES OF AGE AND CONSENT, is abuse.
It's rather ironic that the female who played "Wonder Woman" is so muddled and passive. There are dozens of actresses who are real heroines and that includes taking the time to assign a secretary or a webmaster or a fan to be their VeRO rep, and take a minute to take down offensive photos.
A reminder: ALL that is needed to get misogynistic, obnoxious photos of any celebrity off eBay, is for the celebrity to send, on letterhead, authorization: "I authorize this fan, this lawyer, this webmaster, this relative of mine...to take the ONE minute to cut and paste the number of the auction and send it to vero@ebay.com." Thank you.
Here's Lynda Carter in the New York Post, letting us know that her husband is surprised that there's mistreatment going on. Mr. Carter (or however you want to be addressed) how do YOU feel about guys in eBay selling fake nudes of your wife?
Meanwhile, some perverts, some woman-haters, some drug addicts...are saying "thank you, Lynda Carter, for letting us sell counterfeits and fakes on eBay and make a lazy living off your face on somebody else's naked body."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



































