Raping Patricia Arquette Turns EBAY bidders on

While Patricia Arquette was clutching her Oscar, and demanding equal rights for women, for EBAY SELLERS it was business as usual.

EBAY is where they sell Patricia Arquette topless, with a gun to her head. This doesn't fall under the EBAY "Offensive Materials" rules, or rules against selling stolen property?

Yes, two sellers offering the same item. There's no honor among thieves.

EBAY smugly insists, "It's up to Arquette to find these images on our sneaky, hidden "adults only" section of our site, and then send a complaint to vero@ebay.com"

But aren't these images in violation of FEDERAL LAW?

Title 18, Sections 2257 and 2257A: all models, actors, actresses, performers and/or other persons who appear in any visual depiction or “sexually explicit conduct” (as that term is defined in 18 U.S.C. §2256). 

Sellers MUST have a signed model release stating age and consent. Where, next to these images is Arquette's signature on a document stating she has agreed to the sales of the photos, and that the photos are compliant with Title 18, Sections 2257 and 2257a of Federal Law? Where is the document from the film company saying they've give these parasites the rights to make a profit over screencaps from the movie? 

EBAY hasn't answered the question of why they don't obey Federal  Law.