All Women Happily Pose Naked so an EBAY Creep can make $3.00 chump change

One veteran (how many YEARS now) eBay seller continues to post FAKE NAKED PICTURES of WOMEN to make pathetic chump change. 

Take out EBAY and PAYPAL's pimp percentage, and the seller makes only a few dollars, but hey, that adds up. And what's the risk? That the pinhead morons who BUY this shit might stalk Mary Kate or Jennifer? Might pester them to autograph these bogus pictures? ALL these fake images are posted as REAL. There is no PERMISSION for them, no statement "these models have signed a form of age and CONSENT." 

EBAY's excuse is "we're just a venue" and "we're very busy" and "we've issued this seller several warnings..." and other examples of irresponsible crapathy. The #metoo movement obviously has a long way to go. This seller wouldn't get away with posting Photoshop pictures of Jewish Al Franken being led to an oven, or Obama about to be lynched or even Al Roker standing next to a Klansman.

But abuse women? SURE....GO RIGHT AHEAD....

PEDOPHILES on PAYPAL and EBAY - where #METOO is IGNORED

PAYPAL and EBAY are two of those faceless, morality-empty Internet success stories. Complaints are ignored. Copyright owners jump through hoops only to find their DMCA's questioned and discarded. Contact with real people who can help rarely happens.  

A few "don't worry, we'll take action" morons man the phone lines, wearing you down as they agree with you, hang up and then do NOTHING. A few others frankly challenge anything and everything you say, and parry any remark with "We don't discuss that" or "I can't forward this call to anyone else" or "You might want to write a letter and mail it to the main office. 

MEANWHILE.... 
Pedophiles prosper. 

The fact is that EBAY doesn't give a damn about Federal Law and whether there's a signed model release of age or consent. Revenge porn can be sold on eBay. "FOUND" and "AMATEUR" pictures are routinely sold: 

Sellers don't even have to PRETEND their models are 18. They don't even have to say in their ads "models are of legal age and full information is on file." Ebay, "just a venue," claims they don't have to abide by the same laws that professional pornographers do, and have signed model releases on file.

The images above were not censored in eBay's sneaky "ADULTS ONLY" section.  The fact is, people can spend all day trolling that area of eBay, never buy anything, and pull all kinds of obscene pictures onto their desktops for free. 

The main area of eBay routinely offers thousands upon thousands of "nude male" gay interest full frontals, and "nude girl" images. Ebay says it's all fine with them, as long as it's in the "art" section. Graphic hardcore USUALLY goes into the"ADULS ONLY" section, but plenty of hardcore magazines, DVDs and photos don't get stopped because Ebay's "report item" link is such a joke.

Here's a seller who offers blatant images of underage boys, nude and embracing. How ADORABLE, says EBAY:

The image was reported to PAYPAL, who also supposedly has "Terms of Service" rules. Their rules prohibit material like this. A phone support person said, "This is a violation. Don't worry. We're gonna cut loose this seller within 48 hours." A WEEK LATER, and the item's still up. Another call to Paypal gets, "Sorry, we can't connect you with "Risk Management" and "Sorry, we can't connect you to the person you spoke with last week." And "Did you buy this? Was there a problem with the sale? We can't really discuss this unless you've made a purchase." 

Paypal and Ebay have phone support people who are either completely stupid, or have been indoctrinated with Scientology-precision in evading all questions and giving NO answers. 

Meanwhile, Ebay and Paypal take in money from anyone who wants to offer pornography. "Schoolgirl" headers involving porn are supposedly illegal on eBay, and a "report this" item has a specific category for ADULT/pedophilia, minors." Only whoever looks at this, is blind to items such as: 

In the REAL WORLD of pornography, the companies scrupulously check the age of all women, check the drivers license, and insist the women pose with their drivers license and real name, and keep that information on file. They care about CONSENT, and want to make sure the women understand how the photos will be used. EBAY could care less. Paypal could care less.

ANY woman can find her images hacked and SOLD on EBAY using PAYPAL. 

In fact, that's how EBAY and PAYPAL want it. They actually expect that women will be surfing all over the Net, know there's a secret "ADULTS ONLY" area of eBay, go through thousands of auction headers involving "FOUND" Polaroids and "AMATEUR GIRL" photos, and if they see themselves, send in a DMCA to have the item removed. Then do it all over again a week later when the seller puts it up again, changing the header title, or using another seller ID.

It's not just celebrities who are abused and humiliated, although THAT category is still rife with abuse. The two examples below? One is from a seller who has spent the past decade frolicking with DOZENS of new identities and is never inconvenienced for even a day when he actually gets suspended for multiple violations. The other seller has been humiliating women for over a year, with eBay phone support saying "Oh yes, we have a lot of violations. He will very shortly get a reprimand. His privileges may be revoked for a day or a week, or he might be restricted to selling only 500 images instead of 4,000." Gosh. 

Yes, for over a year, this last seller has been getting away with pretending his faked-up photos are REAL, and selling them to people who are even more twisted than he is. Does eBay or Paypal care if a celebrity gets a stalker following her around showing her fake nudes and demanding sex? "We're JUST A VENUE..." 

#METOO ; Women abused by pedophile porn on EBay, forgery, and sales of hacked and stolen photos

EBAY.  

They seem to have the attitude, "Woman hating is ok." And "if somebody hacked your photos, or is making nasty Photoshop fakes on you, it's up to YOU to know we have a secret "adults only" section on the site, and you should spend hours every week looking through thousands of disgusting photos to see if some cretin is abusing YOU."

Is that the way it should be? It's strange that EBAY has "offensive materials" rules so that racism and religious bigotry can be easily reported. But misogyny? Even pedophilia? Use "report item" and send the complaint to "offensive materials" and too often NOTHING HAPPENS. 

That includes THIS lot, up on the site today, October 2nd. 

Pedophile faked images of the "Harry Potter" teen star Emma Watson? Of course...

Here's a double dose of chicanery: Jennifer Lawrence fought bitterly when her cellphone was hacked and her private pictures were thrown all over the net. It's not bad enough that dozens of websites posted the images for "shits and giggles." EBAY sellers post them TO MAKE MONEY, for themselves AND for EBAY and PAYPAL who take a percentage. 

Here's a seller who not only downloaded a hacked photo and made it into an 8x10. This maniac claims it was SIGNED by Jennifer Lawrence. As if she was proud of this hacked photo and wanted an EBAY jerk to make $50 off it. (This seller has dozens upon dozens of Photoshop fake nudes ALL miraculously signed by the celebrities who are being abused!) 

Though often hiding behind "we're just a venue," EBAY does shoot down many auctions when they THINK that something is wrong. If you post "one ounce of oregano, which has the same effect as marijuana," they will remove it. If you post "UN-used Panties, They Smell Terrific, Message Me for Details" the auction will be stopped on a "good faith belief" that it violates eBay rules. Why is it that THIS seller above, has been going for a year now, with obvious Photoshop fakes and hacked images?

For the same reason EBAY has a shabby record on stopping sellers who make screen captures of COPYRIGHTED MOVIES and TV SHOWS. The actresses were nude because the scene called for it, but sleazy EBAY sellers take that moment, and sell it with a voyeur prurience. How "legal" is it to take screen captures from a copyrighted film? NOT LEGAL AT ALL. 

THIS seller has been on EBAY with at least 20 different aliases since 1999: 

The seller has another alias for selling thousands of anonymous nude images — which could very well include hacked photos stolen off computers, and "revenge porn" posted by angry husbands and ex-boyfriends. It is against FEDERAL LAW to sell pornography without a signed model release of age and consent. This seller is doing just that. For 19 years now, he's never missed a day of bootlegging, because if he runs up stoppages under one identity, he's got another. EBAY claims they have sophisticated ways of making sure a seller can't use shills or the same computer or other computers to keep coming back. They CLAIM it, but this seller has proven over and over again that EBAY is not very concerned with protecting women and keeping a craven, woman-hating sociopath off their site. 

Do they care that the women whose photos he is duping may not be aware they are being sold and their private images duplicated? 

Sellers on EBAY should ONLY sell photos they themselves took as photographers. YouTube for example, has a rule that uploaders should NOT upload TV shows, movie clips, or music they do not own. They are developing ways for copyrighted material to be matched with uploads. EBAY allows sellers such as the above sociopath, to simply post thousands of anonymous images that he obviously didn't take, and for which he has NO MODEL RELEASE OF AGE AND CONSENT.

This is because EBAY has a bad attitude toward women. 

Sellers should only be allowed to sell photos they took. They should sell magazines and DVDs that are from PROFESSIONAL companies who have the morality to make sure they COMPLY WITH FEDERAL LAW and state on their items, "models are over 18 and their signed model releases are on record."  It is peculiar that porn companies and men's magazines actually show more respect for women than EBAY does. 

EBAY Flaunts Federal Law and #METOO - WHY?

Today, the headlines are about RESPECTING WOMEN. 

It's about ending degrading, humiliating sexual abuse. It's about treating women fairly. Ebay has "offensive materials" rules...but doesn't find ABUSING WOMEN offensive.

What do they find offensive? THIS they do NOT find OFFENSIVE: Cutting the heads of famous women and Photoshopping them onto porn images, and even suggesting these things are real: 

The cheap, nasty seller if this garbage, who pimps and degrades famous women to get a lousy $4, has been warned a few times because managers/agents for some stars have sent in DMCA's. 

Obviously it hasn't been enough to get EBAY to SUSPEND this seller. EBAY phone support routinely says, "Oh, this is offensive, this is against our rules." But this is some hapless woman in Asia who can only "forward this to Trust and Safety" or "it will go to Risk Management." And that's where the buck goes down the toilet, and whoever is in charge shrugs and says "so what. Let these women be abused. They're famous. They deserve it." Something like that.

WORSE, eBay also allows HACKED and STOLEN pictures. We all know that Jennifer Lawrence's photos were stolen. EBAY, "just a venue" pretends otherwise. They don't ask a seller to show a signed model release of age and consent, or an agreement with Lawrence. 

The common sense they use in removing a photo of KKK Klansmen pointing to a black man hanging from a tree...they don't apply to abuses of women. The images here have been censored because, unlike the Photoshop fakes, these are real: 

These things should not be sold by some sociopathic pinhead who wants $4 (after Paypal and EBAY take their cuts, and the fun of being a pimp and selling garbage to potentially dangerous stalkers.

EBAY NEEDS TO BAN PHOTOSHOP IMAGES OF CELEBRITIES, HACKED IMAGES OF CELEBRITIES, and NOT EXPECT CELEBRITIES TO KNOW ABOUT THEIR SECRET "ADULTS ONLY" PART OF THE WEBSITE AND FIND THIS JUNK AND SEND IN A DMCA.

It's not just celebrities that are being abused. ANY woman who ever took a selfie might find that image being SOLD ON EBAY. EBAY does NOT COMPLY with FEDERAL LAW which requires sellers to have SIGNED MODEL RELEASES OF AGE AND CONSENT. For example: 

NOTHING in the ad suggests there's a "signed model release on file" (which is a statement you find on the editorial page of every sex magazine, on the box cover of every DVD, and on every adult website). 

EBAY is irresponsibly NOT making sure that sellers who grind photos through their printers, or spend all day drooling over them in a darkroom, can provide, under penalty of perjury, a signed model release for their items.

EBAY is strangely silent on the issue of WOMEN'S RIGHTS. 

After Peter Braunstein assaulted a co-worker he barely even knew, and led police on a manhunt for weeks, EBAY changed their policy on selling CHLOROFORM on their site. He had bought some on EBAY, as well as a real fireman's badge and uniform, rope and sexual toys, for his night of terror.

Somehow, EBAY does have rules about what is "offensive." It just doesn't apply to ANY of the ABOVE. 

Here's what EBAY finds offensive: 

Really? "Sexual intolerance" can't be defined as allowing women their PRIVACY? THEIR DIGNITY? Anyone famous, from Hillary Clinton to Melania Trump gets defiled by their sexuality and not their politics? Any female star, especially ones who NEVER appeared nude (TAYLOR SWIFT, EMMA WATSON) has to be degraded because a few men are misogynists? Haters? Jealous and sadistic sociopaths? 

EBAY has enough sense to ban a lot of items (prescription drugs, lock picking equipment, digital download versions of books, used underwear) but doesn't have "bots" to enforce all of it. They rely on people to see things and use the "report item" link on the auction. Often, the item isn't stopped because "we have millions of items every day and can't get to them all. Feel free to report it again." But to not even have an "offensive materials" or "adult: not allowed" category that specifically bans the abusive images above? WHO IS RUNNING EBAY?

Here's some of the "offensive materials" eBay will stop...usually within 24 or 48 hours: 

Shouldn't hacked photos, unlicensed amateur photos, and Photoshop fakes be banned? Aren't they in violation of FEDERAL LAW?

Elsewhere on this site, you'll find entries that show some of the other awful images sellers have profited from offering on EBAY, as well as the exact FEDERAL LAW that requires MODEL RELEASES, and which EBAY IGNORES.

What does EBAY want before they get MORALITY and obey FEDERAL LAW? Another PETER BRAUNSTEIN?

What do you think of somebody who isolates freeze-frames of celebrities...and SELLS THEM? 

Peeping JPAULCELEBPHOTOS carves and slashes through copyrighted movies, looking for moments when an actress is briefly nude. Then he sells these freeze-frames. He has no permission to do this. Ebay has let him get away with it. 

Are they waiting for this guy to be in the headlines for sociopathic, misogynistic hate crimes against women? Or are they waiting for one of his BUYERS to be on the front page? 

Isn't it DANGEROUS and FOOLISH to let sellers offer Photoshop fakes, freeze-frames, and "amateur" nudes of women that are actually revenge porn shots downloaded off websites? Why isn't EBAY responsible enough to have a "REPORT ITEM" link that says: "Adult images without model releases, Celebrity intrusion of privacy, offensive image intended to degrade and humiliate"? 

Some years ago, PETER BRAUNSTEIN assaulted a woman...tying her up and terrorizing her, with chloroform he bought on EBAY. Is that what it took for EBAY to decide that dangerous chemicals should NOT be sold on the site? 

Celebrities routinely get Photoshop nude images mailed to them, and people coming up to them at memorabilia shows and signings, too: "Here, sign this for me. Hey, maybe you'd like to get naked for me at your hotel? I know which hotel you are staying in...." 

EBAY sellers routinely sell Photoshop fakes as REAL. Despite the #METOO movement, they show off their hatred of women, and their craven need to dominate any famous woman by selling deliberately degrading fakes, or hacked images, peep upskirt images, and anything else to make a buck and make themselves the Super Pimp and the celebrity the slave. 

Below, many examples of the crude abuse women are getting on EBAY. While EBAY has an "offensive materials" rule so that sellers can't offer morgue photos, atrocity photos, pictures of triumphant Nazis or KKK members degrading blacks and Jews...WOMEN are considered a justifiable target. 

The "JOCUR" is still wild

According to eBay's phone support ladies, many of the troublesome misogynists that they report...get chance after chance to come back and be rotten. 

"Oh yes, we've gotten a lot of complaints on this one...several restrictions...the seller was suspended for a while. This seller will most certainly get another warning..." For breaking Federal Law? Shouldn't eBay take FEDERAL LAW MORE SERIOUSLY?

This repeat offender, some kind of sociopath who can't stop abusing and degrading women for a few dollars, does NOT have MODEL RELEASES OF AGE AND CONSENT. IF a woman has NOT CONSENTED that's a CRIME. 

We're talking about not just celebrities being Photoshopped, or having their images freeze-framed and sold without their knowledge. We're talking about HACKING computers, STEALING pictures and REVENGE PORN.

Does this woman know that the "JOCUR" is wild about selling her image without her knowledge? Nowhere in the ad does he say he has a signed model release from her (or a thousand others he sells). Just crap about "sold collector to collector." EBAY, can you also sell heroin that way? "Collector to collector?"

Why is it that you have rules against KKK and NAZI material being sold on your site, but YOU DO NOT PROTECT WOMEN? 

The first image? What's the cruel "logic" here? That if a woman poses like that for her boyfriend, it's HER fault if he breaks up with her and throws the image all over the Internet? 

The second image? What's the cruel "logic" here? That Natalie Portman is a STAR, so let's take her down a peg? Let's Photoshop her image and degrade and humiliate her for being successful? 

The bottom line is that after all this time, EBAY still does NOT have a "report item" category for: ADULT -- photo without model release, celebrity Photoshop, or other similar abuse. WHY NOT?

Why is it the "JOCUR" is wild again, coming off restrictions and suspensions to do the same thing over and over? 

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/75.2

RESPECTABLE pornographers (yes, indeed) not only make sure to have a SIGNED MODEL RELEASE OF AGE AND CONSENT on their websites, on the label of the DVD and on the inside front page of the magazine, they usually go FURTHER. They have a photo of the model holding up a driver's license or other means of identification, to PROVE the age and the real name. 

EBAY thinks being "just a venue" absolves them from FEDERAL LAW. Where is #METOO and "TIMES UP" to ask CEO Devin Wenig to STOP HUMILIATING AND DEGRADING WOMEN FOR FUN AND PROFIT? 

Given a second chance, and a third, and a fourth: weasels like JPAUL and PKC

"What we can do, if they ignore a warning, and if we warn them again, and if there's a patten of warnings," said one eBay employee in phone support, "is issue a restriction." 

And then? "Another restriction. They might only be allowed to post 100 nude images instead of 1000.   The restriction could last a day or a week. If the seller still ignores these warnings, the restriction could be for a month. Then suspension for a certain length of time. THEN...permanent suspension."

That's giving a LOT of tolerance to woman-haters.

Among them, is THIS seller, who eBay admits has a huge record of violations, and as posting hundreds and hundreds of Photoshop fakes including this: 

Ha ha. Sold as REAL, the heads of the three women in a reboot of "Charlie's Angels," now looking like they are happily running around naked. 

Not only is eBay letting a sociopath prosper, a potential sexual predator, somebody with no morals, but imagine who BUYS this crap? It's a potential stalker who thinks this junk is real. It's somebody with a warped mind. It's somebody who stands on line at a signing event, shoves the fake nude at the astonished and embarrassed celebrity and says "Sign this. I'd love to see you naked in person!" 

Ebay still doesn't have a "REPORT THIS" category for: "Photo sold without a model release of AGE OR CONSENT...including fake celebrity nudes, freeze-frames stolen from movies, and amateur pictures that could be revenge porn." 

THIS seller, also with a huge record of warnings, violations, and second and third and more chances, is a weasel who likes to isolate a nude scene intended to be artistic and to last a few seconds, and turn it into: "Now stare at Barbra Streisand naked. That's not a character she's playing. That's her. This is a copyrighted movie, but let's freeze and copy this moment...so I can make twelve bucks." 

Since Barbra's people are notorious for catching this kind of thing, the seller deliberately spells her last name wrong. Or, he could just be an illiterate jerk. 

Here's another picture where he admits that he's making copies of freeze frames. These aren't HIS copies. He downloads them off various 4Chan, Reddit, Weasel-type websites were guffawing guys who can't get laid spend their lives snickering over the pictures. Aha, what looks like a nipple-slip or SOMETHING that, if you blow up the image, and look carefully....

Note the watermark: DO NOT COPY. This creep copies off hundreds of these images, and if he remembers, puts DO NOT COPY on, in case some other weasel grabs the image off the ad and starts making copies, too. 

How does eBay justify the obvious theft from copyrighted movies? The obvious illegal duplication of nude images designed specifically to target women with unwanted attention? These women didn't make these films thinking their nude scenes would be taken out of context and SOLD to potentially dangerous morons, like the stalker who murdered Rebecca Schaeffer.

In the #metoo movement, the theme has been, "Hey, I was humiliated by Harvey Weinstein, too...I was degraded by Les Moonves, too..." and if five, ten, fifteen or more say so, then something happens. 

Ebay seems to have that same viewpoint: it will take MANY outcries before they listen. These two sellers should have gotten one or two warnings and SUSPENSION. This isn't bootlegging music or books. This is a form of sexual abuse.