EBAY: Sleazier than Donald Trump and Bill Clinton combined

What's worse than "objectifying" women? Getting paid for it. 

EBAY and PAYPAL get paid for it. They take a percentage from sellers who humiliate and degrade women. 

In the real world, if you created "fantasy" images of women being raped, abused, or presented as sluts, you'd be jailed. On EBAY you can be a "TOP RATED SELLER" for it. 



Imagining Jennifer Aniston a rape-slave? 

Imagining under-age "Harry Potter" star Emma Watson forced to suck cock?

EBAY seems to think this material isn't "offensive." You kind of wonder what DEVIN WENIG, the CEO thinks about this. Does he know? Does he care? 

Phone calls to EBAY's ONLY working number will get you somebody in the Philippines or India. The hapless stooge will admit, "Oh, this is very bad, I will be sure to forward this to the proper person." WHO is that "proper person?" You are never told. 

The VERO program is supposedly designed to find and remove sellers who are offering unlicensed material, such as bootlegs and photos that have no signed model release of age and consent. 

However, if TAYLOR SWIFT's VeRO rep points to a seller who is offering obnoxious, vile material on Taylor, EBAY and PAYPAL conveniently ignore the rest of the items on the list. Like, just because Taylor Swift's rep caught the seller, let's NOT ask the seller to prove that the other items are legit. Let this seller abuse Chloe Moretz and Ariana Grande and hundreds more.






DEVIN WENIG, you want to explain the insanity of why you allow these images? Are you the CEO of EBAY or a pimp? A pimp makes money off the sexual abuse of women. 

When will EBAY have an official rule that "offensive materials" include the obvious degradation and humiliation of women, done WITHOUT THEIR KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT?

PAYPAL has "terms of service" that reject transactions involving vile acts of pornography, but how do they define vile? If you contact them you might get a dry reply: "if you represent Ariana Grande, please send us a proper takedown, request, using our tedious forms, and if you don't fill them out EXACTLY we will ignore you." 

Maybe you'll get a form letter: "Appropriate action will be taken. Due to privacy concerns, we will not tell you what that action night be." Which is NOTHING.

This particular seller has some of the nastiest "fantasy" photos around. Even Donald Trump wouldn't say, "folks, I have a fantasy of Chloe Moretz being pounded by two blacks." But on EBAY and with PAYPAL, what Moretz doesn't know MAKES MONEY.

Taylor Swift's VeRO rep is not likely to see deliberately spoofed spellings of Taylor's name. This way, anyone checking out a seller's list of crude items, will find THESE:



When does it end, DEVIN WENIG? 

PAYPAL and EBAY. Do you NOT know by now what is going on in the sneaky secret "adults only" area? Or do you really need the sixty cents you make off a $6.00 "buy it now" gang-bang rape photo done without a woman's knowledge or consent?

Rose McGowan - VISUAL RAPE ON EBAY

Rose McGowan has made the news, talking about an experience as a victim of a sexual attack.

She is STILL being victimized. ON EBAY. Like this:

Taking advantage of women, exploiting them without their knowledge, humiliating and degrading them for profit -- THAT is EBAY?

Right now EBAY still does NOT include women in their ban on "offensive materials." Ebay sellers can't dupe photos of autopsies, accident victims, or assaulted people such as Sharon Tate and Nicole Simpson. But they can sell lewd buttons that show SELENA GOMEZ being bound and RAPED

What sort of monster would want to actually WEAR A BUTTON and show off a picture like this?

More buttons, dozens and dozens, all designed to humiliate and degrade women for a thrill or a laugh: 

Somebody a LOT nastier than Donald "Locker Room Talk" Trump. Who'd SELL such a thing? Why in the world would EBAY AND PAYPAL allow this? 

Where is the model release of age and consent?

Right now, only McGowan or Gomez could file a takedown, by contacting vero@ebay.com or having a lawyer or someone they appointed as their "VeRO" rep do it. 

EBAY states “at our discretion we may remove adult items not mentioned in this policy” and “obscene materials, while not easy to define, aren’t allowed,” but there's NO way of reporting these auctions so they can make such a judgment. A menu bar for "report this item" gives you a topic header like "offensive materials." You send it to some sleepy-eyed man in Pakistan or the Philippines who eBay farms abuses to, and he shrugs. He probably doesn't know "at our discretion we may remove adult items" and might think it's hilarious that women are being stripped naked in "fantasy" images or bound and raped. 

It's time eBAY simply states that sellers can NOT humiliate and degrade with "celebrity porn," and that they need to have signed model releases of AGE AND CONSENT. 

Anything else is vile, depraved, and quite likely a violation of Federal Law that could be prosecuted by the Attorney General. 

Donald Trump "Grab Her Pussy" is nothing compared to Visual Rape EBAY

Donald Trump has caused controversy with something he said. It was a locker room brag. 

By contrast, EBAY is accosting, assaulting, raping, humiliating and degrading women every day RIGHT NOW, WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT,  and for profit. So is PAYPAL. 

Did you know EBAY has a "red light district?" They do. They have a secret "adult" section. Anyone registered with eBay can access it: 

http://www.ebay.com/sch/Adult-Only-/319/i.html

"Revenge Porn" is alive and well in the ADULT area at eBay. Federal Law requires a signed model release of age and consent. EBAY ignores this, on items such as:

Aside from grabbing "revenge porn" pictures and scanning them, anyone can download stolen images off renegade websites and sell them on EBAY. 

Does EBAY conform to Federal Law and demand a signed model release of age and consent on file for the photos being sold? Of course not. That's why any sleaze ball can grind stolen pictures through his printer and merely offer this line: 

Anything about AGE AND CONSENT? No. That "ABOUT US" line is from John (an old perv in New Jersey). He simply offers "reproductions." No licensing. No permission. NO MODEL RELEASE OF AGE AND CONSENT. And that's just fine with EBAY.

How fine? He's been reported. Several celebrities have demanded he stop selling their Photoshopped images. EBAY shrugs and says, "He's a TOP RATED seller." How about TOP RAPER seller? 

He currently sells over a thousand Photoshopped fake nudes he stole off the Internet, including pedophile pictures of Emma Watson. Like this: 

Celebrities aren't the only prey. EBAY and PAYPAL allow any seller to sell just about ANYTHING without any statement about AGE AND CONSENT.

In other words, if a woman posed for her boyfriend or husband, she is NOT protected on EBAY if that person eventually decides to "get even" and start selling the images. This seller, like most, says the model is over 18, but doesn't say he obeys Federal Law and has a signed model release to prove it. 

Donald Trump, owner of beauty pageants, loudmouth braggart, is accused of thinking of women as nothing but body parts? How about THIS seller? He's among the many who shoves as many terms as possible in his headers. To him, women are nothing but ASS PUSSY BUTT

Where DID this guy get the photo? Did he take it himself? Does he have a model release? Here's what he writes:

In the REAL world, in the ETHICAL world that EBAY doesn't seem to care about, adult magazines, adult DVDs, and websites that offer memberships to view adult photos, all state compliance with Federal Law: "18 U.S.C § 2257 and 28 CFR Chapter 1, Part 75) All models are over 18 years of age. Records are available for inspection"

At this moment THIRTY different obscene photos of IVANKA TRUMP are for sale on EBAY. Should Ivanka Trump have to check Ebay's sneaky "Adults Only" area and find them and report them? That's EBAY's arrogance. They actually think so. They don't think it's a crime that these photos are being offered without a signed model release of age and consent.

The arrogance of giant Internet companies like EBAY is much worse than anything from Donald Trump. Can someone pick up a phone and get through to Trump's campaign? Is the name of Trump's publicist known? At EBAY, there's anonymity. Call up their San Jose executive office and you are disconnected if you don't already know the code-number of the person you are dialing. Try it: 408-376-7400. Call up their main support number 866-540-3229 and you get somebody from the Philippines, India or Asia telling you they will forward your question to somebody. They will not give you a follow-up number. They will not patch you through to anyone who is actually in the EBAY office in San Jose or Draper, Utah. 

This is why we end up with a disgraceful situation that should have been remedied long ago. Women should not be abused on EBAY. Sexual images of celebrities should be banned. Any "housewife" or "sexy teen" photos should be sold only by accredited and approved sellers who are also the photographers and have the signed model releases on file. Pictures should NOT be offered with the caveat "sold collector to collector no rights implied" or other weasel terms.

It's the 21st Century. It's time that EBAY respects women and stops allowing offensive abuses. Do they allow harassment of female employees, too? Can a guy Photoshop a photo of a female employee and pass it around with a chuckle? What IS the limit at EBAY? And why does PAYPAL hide behind their own maze of anonymous people answering emails with form letters and answering the the phone with a vague "we'll look into it" and no accountability? 

It shouldn't be up to a housewife to check through every photo on EBAY to make sure she's not being sold without her permission. It shouldn't be up to Emma Watson to file a takedown on photos such as these: 

EBAY is a big company. Like any big company it is a bureaucracy. Executives sometimes are not aware of what is going on in every division. 

DEVIN WENIG, CEO. MARIE OH HUBER, EXECUTIVE COUNSEL. This IS a problem. It needs to be addressed. 

Please BAN the sale of celebrity nude images. It should not be up to Emma Watson or Selena Gomez or the estate of Annette Funicello to check out disgusting images and report them. Any fan should be able to report the item, and sellers should be suspended after multiple reports (which is not the case with JOHNSWELLSTUFF12, still going after a dozen offenses). 

Women should have at least the safeguard that EBAY sellers are having to conform to FEDERAL LAW and state they have signed model releases of age and consent, AND CAN PRODUCE THEM IF RED-FLAGGED, and will accept SUSPENSION if they can't produce the documents. 

EBAY violates Federal Law and embraces PEDOPHILES

All you need is a Paypal account, it seems. Then go on eBAY and start abusing women. You don't need to worry that you DO NOT HAVE A SIGNED MODEL RELEASE OF AGE AND CONSENT.

In their secret "Adults Only" area, EBAY is making a profit on PEDOPHILE images of celebrities. How about SELENA GOMEZ crucified? Or a vintage photo of "Brady Bunch" girl MAUREEN MCCORMICK tricked up to make it seems she loves to pose naked?

Incredibly, THIS seller in New Jersey has actually been stopped by various actresses who discovered the abuse and reported it. Ebay removed the items and has NOT SUSPENDED THE SELLER.

The seller has snuck nude images in the "regular" section of eBay many times as well. Ebay laughs, "We're JUST a venue, use the "report this item" link." The item may be removed but Ebay doesn't look at the rest of the abuses from the seller. 

In fact, eBay often chooses to "interpret" their own rules in favor of a seller. What is YOUR definition of "offensive materials?" Or "FRAUD?" How about an obviously fake photo of Dakota Fanning naked? It was reported and NOT STOPPED:

At the moment, the only sure way to get a fake nude image removed from eBay is for the woman in the photo to KNOW ABOUT IT and then REPORT IT, and perhaps, depending on the mood of someone in the VeRO program, explain "why it infringes." 

This applies to what would seem to be pretty obvious abuses on underage girls. Let's put it this way, in the REAL WORLD, and at EBAY and PAYPAL, no man could walk around showing off "fantasy" images of another employee. 

Say "Here's my FANTASY image of Ms. Watson in accounting, being gang-raped, or getting her face squirted with semen," and Paypal or Ebay would fire you. But here, you are encouraged, and they get a dollar percentage:

This site makes no money. It loses money. This site is not campaigning for any politician or seeking anything but this:

COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL LAW. 

If women want to appear in porn, fine. Check any porn magazine or DVD. It says that the women have signed model releases and these releases are available for inspection. 

This is not the case on EBAY. 

An irony is that EBAY will not allow a seller to offer a duplicate or counterfeit image glorifying the KKK or the Nazi era. It will not allow a seller to profit by offering a photo of an accident victim to some ghoulish thrill seeker. BUT they have no problem with all the images above. These don't fall under "offensive materials." 

According to Rolling Stone, websites are now being prosecuted for "revenge porn" and celebrity leaked photos and other such material. Is that what it will take? 

This website would like to report "EBAY's CEO's have looked into the problem and fixed it," as they did when they outlawed the sale of chloroform after Peter Braunstein bought some on eBay to sexually assault a woman in Manhattan. 

Do the items you've just seen seem like OFFENSIVE MATERIALS? They are also in violation of Federal Law, in being sold without the women's consent. ENOUGH is ENOUGH. 

EBAY: HOW MANY TIMES MUST A WOMAN CRY "RAPE!"

A woman goes to the police. 

"I have been raped." 

The police nod. No question about it. 

"Get that man off the street so he doesn't do it again." 

The police shake their heads. 

"What we can do is ask the rapist not to fuck you again. If he does, he may get another warning. If he fucks you a third time, we may put him in jail for a week. If he does it again, we'll put him in jail for a whole month." 

WHAT?

And yet, that's what happens on EBAY.

A proven VISUAL RAPIST is allowed to keep doing it. 

If Emma Watson objects to being portrayed as a slut who wanders around naked...

...the seller can re-post that image again and again before any action is taken. That the image is also a pedophile image taken before she was 18, and that it's in violation of Federal Law because there's no signed model release of age and consent...STILL doesn't seem to matter to EBAY.

When a seller has done something so heinous as deliberate visual rape, and pretending a photo is REAL, and has been CAUGHT...shouldn't that seller cease and desist? Instead of posting 500 more images, shouldn't that seller now have to show proof of age and consent and licensing? 

The seller above was caught. And caught. And caught. SEVERAL prominent actresses told the VeRO (verified rights owner) program this man and wife in New Jersey were NOT authorized and had NO PERMISSION to sell these Photoshop jobs on them. 

On August 24th, a report was filed with PAYPAL, and shortly after that, the seller pulled all the items. It seemed that finally, justice had prevailed. 

Just why the seller, less than 3 weeks later, decided to sneak FIVE HUNDRED more into eBay's "adults only" section, nobody (as of this writing) knows. Hopefully the seller will finally be suspended.

Meanwhile, his visual rape list includes the Emma Watson image, and, despite her having lost her sister just a few days ago and being in mourning, Rosanna Arquette. 

Rapists. Visual rapists. It's the same motivation: sociopathic rage and hatred. That a MARRIED COUPLE do this is even more disturbing. The list goes on and on, including: 

Doesn't "NO" mean "NO?" When several women have alerted EBAY that there's a visual rapist preying on them, and on their sisters, shouldn't meaningful action be taken? 

When Federal law requires pornographers to have a signed statement of AGE AND CONSENT on file, shouldn't eBay's pornographers be doing that? 

Haven't we gone beyond the cynical "she was asking for it" excuse? What's going on here? Emma Watson, star of "Harry Potter" movies, is ASKING for it? 

If a woman is a celebrity, that means that her private photos can be hacked and tossed all over the Internet, and her emails leaked by people who get their jollies by invading privacy? 

The strange twist here, is that if a man worked at EBAY or PAYPAL and passed around a Photoshop job on a female co-worker, he'd be fired, and perhaps even arrested. But that courtesy and respect doesn't extend to women who are being SOLD on EBAY, with money collected by PAYPAL? 

Somebody on EBAY says "Here's hot pix of my ex-wife" "Here's my girlfriend naked" and no signed model release is needed? Someone says, "Here's Emma Watson...Selena Gomez...Tara Lipinski...Gabby Douglas..." all underage...and it's ok to profit off lewd pedophile images? It's up to Emma to know there's an "adult" section on EBAY and to go look at this stuff and report it? 

When one woman comes forward and says, "This is sex without consent," it should send a message of concern, not a shrug of apathy. 

EBAY: Selena Gomez Raped and Abused for "FUN" and PROFIT

It's called PEDOPHILIA. 

Selena Gomez was born July 22, 1992, and much of her fame, and many of the images of her, derives from work she did before she turned 18.

Do you suppose any of the EBAY SELLERS who like to imagine her raped or in bondage, have any statement of AGE and consent? Why doesn't EBAY demand it? 

Why is EBAY still holding meetings about what their rules should be on "offensive materials" or on sellers who have been stopped on certain celebrities, proven to be in violation, but are allowed to continue to abuse other women with rape fantasies, bondage, bukkake, "leaked" (stolen) images and Photoshop jobs presented as real? 

EBAY doesn't hide behind DMCA laws when it comes to Nazi memorabilia, promotional t-shirts sold to benefit the KKK, or even duplication of crime scene and disaster photos that appeal to prurient interest. Post shots of Nicole Simpson or Sharon Tate at their death scenes and it doesn't take a request from Nicole or Sharon's family to have it removed. 

But these images of Selena Gomez? Gomez's family, agent or manager has to know there's a "secret" area of EBAY for "adult" images, and then take the time to report it. Many don't understand that it doesn't take a $200 an hour lawyer to remove an auction. All it takes is someone authorized (it could even be the head of a fan club) and it takes exactly a minute to cut and paste an auction number onto an e-mail. 

And yet, over 200 Gomez items, many of them of her when she was underage, ALL of them without consent, and ALL of them with stolen "bottom half" porn images, are on EBAY right now.

If you know a celebrity and wish to become the VeRO rep to prevent this kind of abuse, you'll find information at:
pages.ebay.com/vero/notice.html

The page looks like this: 

EBAY usually responds to problems that crop up. After Peter Braunstein assaulted a woman in Manhattan, they revised their position on allowing chloroform to be sold. Yes, some still try and sell it, but anyone who sees such an auction can report it and it'll be removed.

There is no reason at all for allowing women to be humiliated, have their privacy invaded, or be depicted as victims of rape or bondage. If there is no signed document of AGE and CONSENT, the item should not be posted. 

Sellers of professionally produced magazines and DVDs don't have to worry, the AGE and CONSENT provision is on the product. Not so with celebrity porn grinded through a printer, or "leaked" photos and the rest of it. 

DO PAM ANDERSON & SHMULEY BIOTECH know EBAY?

The other day, Pamela Anderson, by many accounts a sweet and caring woman (and a PETA spokesperson) came out against porn. By her side was Rabbi Shmuley Boteach (whom Spellcheck wants to re-name Biotech. Thanks, lots.) 

Perhaps she will lead by example, and have someone be her VERO rep and remove the nearly 100 porn auctions EBAY is running without her consent. Stuff like:

It would also be helpful if Pam can persuade some of her famous female friends to ALSO have a VeRO rep remove auctions in the sneaky "adults only" area of EBAY. 

Additionally, Pam might want to make sure that ANYONE illegally duplicating her image, or making mousepads or t-shirts or decals and selling them on EBAY, CEASE AND DESIST...or...arrange with "eBay Charity" so that 50% of the profits go directly to PETA.